Says the guy who is writer, no player. And the guy who never won crystals/play more then 2 years/.And never been invited to some clan.Actually I don't care of you.I talk to the theme and you answer me with no any sense.About noob ,I kill you with my poor tank who is 2-3 weeks age and has the same eff like your noob zerk,which you play long time ago and earn nothing.Only cry on forum and global chat.

@up I am pretty sure WW can change the rules to some degree.

(For guys who don't care about us, just don't read it below.)


Maybe im a writer not a player, then why you even talk? Again, why do you care about me? Just say apology and go away quietly.
You have invited me to your clan, on your own. It's like now you shot yourself in your foot. So weak...

You kill me, for sure Your tank loses 50 per 80 games. I remember you. Puppies, not a tank. No skill. And if 2-3 weeks are enough to get almost full average eq and 20+ level then wow, did you just shot your second foot?
This zerker is new, that new that I only managed to get full heavy. And you mention the bv. Damn, you are really stupid man I remember your full epic colourful zerker with runes/amus has +400 bv comparing to mine. Damn. THAT's a shot in the head. And with this eq difference I can still ezly kill you. If I were you now I'd hide myself low under the ground level and not look up what's above for another year.

I think Xylar is right.
Strict rules were made to prevent teams from falsing grid like former Lunastra (from 7 month ago) used to do every week (and nothing happened to them).
But now, to fight it, it has become the exact opposite. Good decisions are the one in-betweens, not extreme measure.
It's been a while no team tried to false grid or cheat, but it is the third week in a row some team pays for something they did not do wrong (counting Exclusive has almost punished)
It's not about looking the other way for a fault we committed, because we did NOT do anything wrong except having an emergency during 15 minuts.
This last rule for example is made to prevent teams of 6 players to tag just for cristals, but we began 7 battles out of 8 at 7 and only 1 out of 8 at 6. So the reason of this rule doesn't apply, especially when we will prove next weeks during the SAME tournament that we are not 6 persons tagging for cristals, but a real team who just had unforeseen events.
Rules are made to be used smartly, they should not discriminate teams that did not do something wrong (third time in a month.) It's easy to spot teams trying to cheat, but it's been a while no one tried, and we all pay the price now.
I understand for example that MW teams were banned for a week because one didn't show up (could have seemed they were trying to choose better line), but seriously, a second week ban kept when they explained the tornado thing ? it's a bit tough and exagerated too I think.
I really understand WW that you are trying to put strict rules so tournaments become fair, and it's true that now, thanks to that, no one cheated for a long time, but the pleasure of playing is not the same anymore when you can be banned or punished for small things or events you did not predict and that does not change anything in the gameplay experience of others.

Wait.. so which one is now valid, ghot tangra or svet angel? ^^

Because -Disorder- Follow the rules too much and started with 6 even if there where players available they will be given there points too.