Panzarians,



Well, it's time to talk about those who do not justify the high rank of " PANZAR warrior ". The unenlightened person leaving the game sessions, thereby summing teammates and breaking the course of the battle - that he was talking about. Of course, everyone can be in a situation where he would need to urgently get out of the game: the mere fact that "Lebanon" is not yet worthy of condemnation. But if you do it too often, clearly abusing the inconvenience and delivering a huge number of other players, you can earn a punishment.

For this Panzar created a report to find these players faster.

On Russian server 11 players got punished for three weeks. Apart from these, the ban for one week went to other people - a total of more than a hundred - who also left the game sessions too often, though not in such quantities. On this we all. Respect yourself, allies and rivals, soberly assess their capabilities and try not to get out of a fight to the end.

PS: I will do my first scan for EU player that have left more then 50% of the games will get a ban from the game for 1 week and current scan from monday until today already give me 3 eu players.

It's a great news, but I believe it doesn't change too much. Leavers still have big efficiency, and they still have influence for unfair matchmaking. This punishment only shift in time their actions.

OK, Monday the players that leave more than 50% will get a ban.

Week after that it will be 15% if you want visible to see who will get banned go to the rating page everyone with more than 8 leaves on that page will get game ban. But it is Percentage, if you play 100 games, the number of allowed leaves are also higher.

To get on rating page you need to play min 50 games in 1 week. = 7,5 leaves, 100 games = 15 leaves allowed

Leave = Game Crash = Leave?

Yes

Exit Battle = detected as Exit Battle = Leave
Crash Game = detected as Exit Other = Leave
AFK = detected as AFK = Leave

Only things that are not counted are exit battle, crash and AFK in Tournament and Clan Battles

YES very good news, but 50% of games is little bit to high.
30% of all games should be enough!

15 Leaves by 100 games is to much!!
And ya in Panzarpage you saw only leaves over exit button!Not over Task Manager, i hope you know that

This is a good news, however, we are trying to solve a big problem of Panzar from the wrong direction. We have different kind of leavers, those who leave at the beginning of the battle, those who leave at the middle of the battle and last but not least, those who leave at the very end of the battle. We also have players who are AFK the whole battle, which can also be divided into two groups: those who stay with 0 points (they just dont like the matchmaking but dont wanna leave either, so a team play with one player less) and 2nd: those who collect 50-80 points and then become AFK( those who wanna lose BV+earn the resources, yes, i have seen inqs with epic rank 4 and +7k mastery and 3k eff)

Those leavers have different reasons for leaving games, but those who leave at the end (because they are concerned about their effectiveness (BV)) does not have as much impact on the game play as those who leave at the middle of the game or worse, those who stay idle(including dwarfs who make bad TP far from the point).

Why some players leave at the beginning? because of the bad matchmaking. Yes, I'm one of those, I left many games when I see the enemy has tank and my team has none. It's really waste of time to play such matches. Enemy gunner and fire earn too much CP in very short time very easily as the other team doesn't have any tank to shield, and on the other side the team without a tank cannot even make a gun. and 99% of the time the team with the tank successfully freezes the opponent team as the frost with a shield (even a noob one) always wins, thus the zerk with the tank will have 5 rage just at the start of the battle, and then the rest of the game you have to listen to the disturbing announcer saying: Monster kill, Zar fury, Mega kill, Total wipeout!!! again and again...
Note that the problem is not lack of tanks, as the next game you see 4 tanks the battle. Its just the way devs wanna shorten the waiting time, it is NOT working. I would rather wait 15min for a fair matchmaking than waiting 5 sec and going to ongoing battles, taking the place of a leaver of a losing team.

The main problem here, is the matchmaking, the matchmaking, and the matchmaking.

PS, as Eisbaer said, the list on panz's website does not include the leaves with closing the game via task manager, is it going to be a workaround for leaving battles and not getting banned?

ouhhhh then we have to say "good bye GodsIce 19 leaves crazy booooy ) sing it: dont worry lalala be ThunderBunny lalal.... dont worryyyyyyy.

That makes me laugh!
Who n has ever left of part(party)?

All the players who complain about players who leave one made an excessive use themselves of the system at the beginning and now they complain about others too too hardly!

Personally I leave of part because to play with Russians who make anything so irritates to me that I prefer to leave the part it is the system of points that it is necessary to change, as long as made kill somebody will bring back more that to help his team-mate there will not be an improvement in the way of playing in team!

good news